Is Immaturity the Reason Danny Didn't Trade For Nurkic?

Go down

Is Immaturity the Reason Danny Didn't Trade For Nurkic?

Post by bobheckler on Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:26 am

Tim Connelly reveals why he traded Jusuf Nurkic to Portland

By Harrison Wind on October 9, 2017

Credit: Craig Mitchelldyer-USA TODAY Sports

Eight months after the trade deadline deal that sent Jusuf Nurkic and a first-round pick to the Trail Blazers in exchange for Mason Plumlee, the highly-publicized and debated trade looks like a win-win for both Portland and Denver.

The Trail Blazers potentially have their franchise center and a big man who fits well with their cornerstone backcourt of Damian Lillard and C.J. McCollum while Denver, who just re-upped Plumlee to a three-year $41 million contract, has their backup center for the foreseeable future and one that fits their culture and basketball philosophy.

Sure the trade had its obvious drawbacks from Denver’s perspective. The Trail Blazers, who were just 23-32 when they acquired Nurkic — two games in the loss column behind the Nuggets in the Western Conference standings — ran off 18 wins over their last 27 games to overcome Denver and clinch the eighth seed with a 41-41 record. The kill shot was 122-113 late-March loss in Portland where Nurkic had arguably his best game in a Blazers’ uniform scoring 33 points on 12-15 shooting to go with 15 rebounds and two blocks.

With the win, the Trail Blazers gained a one-game lead on the Nuggets and never looked back. In 20 games with Portland last season, Nurkic averaged a double-double; 15.2 points and 10.4 rebounds in nearly 30 minutes per game.

Denver was eliminated from playoff contention a few weeks later when Russell Westbrook dropped a 50-burger, broke Oscar Robertson‘s record of 41 triple-doubles in a season, and buried a game-winning 36-foot dagger all in the same night before a capacity crowd at Pepsi Center gave the Most Valuable Player a standing ovation for his efforts.

But Nurkic wasn’t happy with his role in Denver after beginning the year in the starting lineup only to fall out of the Nuggets’ rotation a few months later. He let that much be known after a December practice when he casually told reporters that he wasn’t happy with his minutes as Denver’s backup center, that he didn’t feel like a part of the team anymore, and that he had communication issues with coach Michael Malone. Nurkic also left the arena during Denver’s 121-117 win over the Milwaukee Bucks — the night Nikola Jokic recorded the first of his six triple-doubles last season — but later returned and was in the locker room after the buzzer sounded. It quickly became clear that the Nuggets had to make a move.

In an appearance on The Woj Pod, hosted by ESPN’s Adrian Wojnarowski, Nuggets’ president of basketball operations Tim Connelly shed some light on his decision to trade Nurkic and why the 23-year-old wound up in Rip City.

“We had well-publicized issues as Nikola started to take off. Juka (Jusuf), who’s a great kid, was struggling with his new role,” Connelly rehashed. “It was no secret league-wide. We thought a guy like Mason with his ability to play with and without Nikola with his physicality, with his team-first approach, might be a good fit.”

Connelly continued about how there was surprisingly very little interest in Nurkic across the league when he started making trade calls.

Certainly its been fantastic for Juka to have that starting opporutntiy. He played great. I don’t think anyone ever questioned his talent or skill-set and we’re extremely happy to have Mason but there are very few calls you can make or take where it’s ‘you know we have too many small forwards and you have got a good power forward’ or ‘this guy’s a good player’ and that part’s frustrating  in that regard. During the Nurkic conversations, kind of realizing a chang of scenery would be good for both the player and the team, how few willing partners there were even teams on paper at least ‘hey we think this guy’s a starting center. He’s proven to be such.’ Juka would be the first to tell you he’d probably handle some things differently. He was an immature kid at the time and emotionally you never know how he’s going to deal with things. But he’s a good kid and a very good player. I was shocked when you make these calls and teams think ‘hey they really need a center’ or ‘this team can’t rebound a lick this will be an easy one,’ how rarely that basketball is the focus on the conversation.

Fast-forward through the summer months and Denver has watched Plumlee patch together an encouraging preseason as he continues to find himself within Denver’s read-and-react offense while also giving the Nuggets a touch of athleticism from the center position — something they don’t get with Jokic.

The initial sting from Nurkic’s rise in Portland and the Trail Blazers’ subsequent playoff berth still hurts Denver’s brass to this day, but continued improvement from Plumlee and a regular season where the Nuggets could finish ahead of their Northwest Division rivals in the Western Conference pantheon would certainly be well worth last year’s disappointment.

MY NOTE:  "I was shocked when you make these calls and teams think ‘hey they really need a center’ or ‘this team can’t rebound a lick this will be an easy one,’ how rarely that basketbll is the focus on the conversation."  Hmmm, what team that can't rebound a lick might they have been talking about?  He could have gotten DeMarcus Cousins for a song too, but chose not to.  Looking at the other side of the coin, he has made a point of drafting high integrity and mature players like Smart, Brown and Tatum.  He has also signed Horford, who also fits that description to a "T" and, from what I've read, made a lot of calls about Kyrie Irving before he made that trade.  With Markelle Fultz the storyline was that Brad called Fultz's High School coach to ask how Fultz handled adversity.  That wasn't a basketball call, Brad didn't ask him if Fultz practiced his dribbling, that was a "character" call. It wasn't too long after that call that the trade with Philly took shape.

Danny is like a cat.  Put a cat on a hotplate and it will never step on a hotplate again, even if it's cool.  He loses Tony Allen in free agency to Memphis for nothing, he later trades Rondo because Rondo wanted to be courted league-wide as a free agent and wouldn't commit to Boston.  He gets Keith Bogans in the Brooklyn trade and hasn't touched a poor character player since.

Is immaturity the reason why Danny didn't go for Nurkic, because he didn't think he'd fit "pace and space" or because he has a blind spot for bigs?  Last year I might have said the last one,  but then Danny signed Baynes.

What do you think?


Posts : 37893
Join date : 2009-10-28

Back to top Go down

Re: Is Immaturity the Reason Danny Didn't Trade For Nurkic?

Post by KyleCleric on Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:47 am

He doesn't fit pace and space.


Posts : 531
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 32

Back to top Go down

Re: Is Immaturity the Reason Danny Didn't Trade For Nurkic?

Post by beat on Mon Oct 09, 2017 12:01 pm

I think you are giving cats way too much credit!


Posts : 6965
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 65

Back to top Go down

Re: Is Immaturity the Reason Danny Didn't Trade For Nurkic?

Post by red16russ11 on Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:35 pm

I was all for drafting Nurcic, and I think we would have, but he went one slot above us, and we took James Young. Right now, it's a pace and space thing.

Posts : 506
Join date : 2017-05-31
Age : 58

Back to top Go down

Re: Is Immaturity the Reason Danny Didn't Trade For Nurkic?

Post by kdp59 on Mon Oct 09, 2017 2:15 pm

i'd rather have Plumlee myself.


Posts : 3716
Join date : 2014-01-05
Age : 58

Back to top Go down

Re: Is Immaturity the Reason Danny Didn't Trade For Nurkic?

Post by Sponsored content

Sponsored content

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum