Bulpett: Prudent Celtics know they need more than just one impact player Wasn't going to happen at trade deadline

BOSTON HERALD

Steve Bulpett Monday, February 27, 2017

Merely adding Paul George to the Celtics' roster wasn't going to be enough to put the Green over the top this season.

AUBURN HILLS, Mich. — It can be difficult to read between the lines of NBA executive-speak — at least that which is uttered in public. With the NBA’s tampering rules, there is so much a general manager cannot say about others. With concern about his own players’ feelings, there is even more that he does not want to say.

So as we step away from a quiet trade deadline for the Celtics, perhaps the most accurate way to decipher what they didn’t do is to see it through the prism of what they need to do.

Each potential transaction needs to be examined for how it would impact subsequent deals. It is very much chess, with a critical need to see the board and the moves ahead. But chess is relatively simple from the standpoint that one is trying to capture one piece, the king.

It’s clear, however, the Celtics believe they still need to bag two major pieces, which is why they didn’t give up the store for Jimmy Butler or Paul George. Leaving aside George’s declaration that he wants to either win in Indiana or bolt as a free agent to the Lakers in 2018 — a pronouncement that made a trade essentially impossible for anyone — acquiring him would have made the needed corollary move more difficult.

The Celts were willing to go deep for the Pacer star and figure the rest out later, but just adding him to what’s here now would still leave them shy of their desired destination.

There is no question president of basketball operations Danny Ainge is amenable to such deals. My first reaction on draft night in 2007 when the Celts traded the No. 5 pick, Wally Szczerbiak and Delonte West for a nearly 32-year-old Ray Allen was that it made little sense unless there was another shoe to drop.

That more footwear did — and that said sneaker belonged to Kevin Garnett — made the Celtics a true title contender. Take him out of the mix, and the C’s could still be after the 17th banner that adorns the Garden ceiling.

Ainge made a fairly bold step last summer when he signed the No. 2 free agent on the market. (And those who complain about Al Horford’s max contract need to understand that was his established value. If he didn’t get it from the Celts, he would have gotten it elsewhere.)

But Horford, like Allen nine years earlier, was merely the first step in the desired process. By getting him, the C’s had to believe it would help them land the bigger fish, Kevin Durant. When KD Warrior-ed up, Ainge was left to seek alternate routes. He’s still seeking, and right now the Celtics see both the need and opportunity to get two impact players.

Certainly they will revisit the George and Butler situations prior to the draft to see if George’s stance has changed or Chicago has a different expectation for what it can get for Butler. If either is available at the proper price — and, according to league sources, the C’s, the guys who offered four first-round picks for Justise Winslow two years ago, are willing to overpay to a degree — they will pounce on the established talent.

But if there is nothing Ainge believes makes sense, the chances to get those Two Needed Players will be in his hands. The Celtics will have a pick from the Nets that is looking no worse than No. 4, and, after doing some roster cleaning, they will have salary cap space to go after a max contract-level free agent.

With regard to the pick and those who look at the lottery odds and the mere chance of some 25 percent that it could be No. 1 overall, it’s interesting to point out the draft positions of the two players Celtic Nation lit candles for this past week. George was the 10th pick in 2010. Butler went at No. 30, the final choice in the first round, in 2011.

112288

Pierce was 10, wasn`t he, and Bird was 6th , albeit a future pick. (That was one of Red`s slicker moves.)

I am not yet convinced that there will be two "stars" available to the Cs before next season no matter which vehicle you employ.

Salary cap tax payments (at least not big tax payments) do not seem to be part of Ainge's approach these days. And, after signing Horford last summer for max money, I am sure that filling the roster with two more such guys is not part of the agenda. We cannot forget that whomever of Bradley, Thomas and Smart that he will want to keep will all will require new contracts after next season. Olynyk, Zerebko and Johnson are all due up for new contracts this summer. And, even if Ainge does not resign any of these three guys he will have to sign guys to replace them.

What to do if there are not the max level talents to sign in the summer? Or maybe what to do if there is only one such guy to add?

Trading for a max level guy is going to cost at least two players (maybe three?) of the core players on this year's team plus a top level draft pick or two. If you think that Butler is a max level player, he is not coming to Boston from Chicago for James Young, Jordan Mickey and a draft pick because Chicago clearly loses in such a trade and the trade will also not pass the salary equalization requirements.

Signing the guy from Utah who played for Stevens in college (his name escapes me) is certainly no guarantee as he will be leaving tons of money on the table if he leaves Utah for anywhere else.

This concern is why I am much more for adding good young players (Noel, Jones, etc) who are currently much more affordable and let Stevens and his great staff build them into "our star" players like they have done with Bradley, Smart, Crowder, Rozier, etc, etc. This is a big reason that I was disappointed with us doing nothing at the trade deadline.