Please Get It Right

Did you know that Lebron James holds an equity position in the Boston Celtics.

According to ESPN  he does

https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/41286389/nba-expansion-cities-draft-teams-leagues-line



Who are the potential owners in Las Vegas?
There is one very obvious name here: LeBron James.

"For the better part of a decade, James has been transparent about his desire to join Michael Jordan as all-time great turned team governor and become a true shareholder in the NBA. James' off-court investment decisions, including taking an equity position with Boston Celtics, Pittsburgh Penguins and Liverpool FC ownership group Fenway Sports, have been made with this in mind."

My Notes:

Is it me or have we seen a deterioration in factual reporting?  I am seeing sloppy reporting from ESPN. We all know that he has an association with the Fenway Group. That group better keep their greasy hands off the Celtics. They already FU the RedSox.

LeBron is part owner in the Fenway Group that owns the Red Sox. LeBron being a part owner of the Celtics is almost unreal to comprehend. Someone has some info screwed up here. PLEASE

He's always competing with Jordan and other players of the past.

Next up, "Who can screw up an NBA team the most with poor management?"

Magic and Jordan both have got a head start. Can LeBron catch with either? Please, not in Boston.

Definitely poor reporting since Fenway Group does not own Celtics shares.

NYCelt wrote:Definitely poor reporting since Fenway Group does not own Celtics shares.

NYCelt

Here is the other thing that I noticed.  If you click on the link and go to the beginning of the article you will see that is was authored by Multiple Contributors

I call that plausible deniability of stupidity!

dboss wrote:

NYCelt wrote:Definitely poor reporting since Fenway Group does not own Celtics shares.

NYCelt

Here is the other thing that I noticed.  If you click on the link and go to the beginning of the article you will see that is was authored by Multiple Contributors

I call that plausible deniability of stupidity!  

I think you’ve come up with a very useful phrase.