Would you take Q back?

Personally, I've always liked his game. Not much of a fullcourt player, but a good ballhandler and very long and sticky defender. The halfcourt offense, with him handling the ball, became coherent. A surprisingly good and effective post-up shooter, although not someone I'd like to see taking 20-footers. This article raises some interesting stats about a largely unsung, and oft injured, bench player.

If he was cleared by the medical staff to play full-tilt, would you take Q back?

www.redsarmy.com

bob

.

YES

Hi,
Yes. But what position? As insurance if JG finds a better deal? To play behind RA and DW?
Also, will he go for a vet min?

AK

He was playing terrific at the time that he got injured. I believe he could be a good backup for Ray and even PP at the three spot.

He also seemed to have improved his outside shooting a lot, draining a couple of 3s.

There are definitely worse players out there and if he comes at vet min I would not hesitate.