Lex Nihil Novi - "I Got 'em. I Finally Got Him"
+2
Sam
bobheckler
6 posters
Page 1 of 1
Lex Nihil Novi - "I Got 'em. I Finally Got Him"
"I Got 'em. I Finally Got Him"
That's what Larry Bird said to Quinn Buckner a few hours after the Boston Celtics took game 7 of the 1984 Finals. Of course, we all know now who Larry was talking about. I'm about half-way through the HBO documentary. It is outstanding. Perhaps even better. Bird has his game face on throughout the entire show as he reflects back on the rivalry. Stoic, in the moment, the moment having occurred 20-30 years earlier.
Larry Bird was one hell of a competitor.
The amazing thing is so was that other guy.
You didn't have that with Russell-Chamberlain, as Wilt, lacking a killer instinct, didn't uphold his end of the bargain. In any event, during the 1980s, I thought Bird was the better player (a Celtics fan, I may have been slightly biased). Since about 2005, I've given the edge to Magic (Magic's team won the lion's share of the head-to-head match-ups, Magic won more rings, and Magic made it to more Finals).
Tonight, I thought I'd take a slightly different look--season by season.
1979-80: Tie. Bird won Rookie of the Year, Magic won the championship (Finals MVP).
1980-81: Bird. Bird gets the ring. Magic gets injured.
1981-82: Magic. Magic gets the ring by beating the team that beat the Celtics.
1982-83: Tie. Magic gets swept in the Finals, Bird's team quits on Fitch.
1983-84: Bird. MVP. Ring.
1984-85: Tie. Bird and Magic split the MVP and the ring.
1985-86: Bird. MVP, ring, swept the Lakers, Bird's team one of the best ever.
1986-87: Magic. Magic won MVP and a ring after pundits said the Lakers were washed up.
1987-88: Tie. Magic gets the ring, but this may have been Bird's best season.
1988-89: Magic. MVP. Bird injured.
1989-90: Magic. Magic gets the MVP. Bird had a good year, but not a great one.
1990-91: Magic. Lakers make it to the Finals. Bird injured again.
1991-92: Bird. Magic retired.
Magic wins, 5-4-4.
Tough duty making those calls.
After 1986, the Celtics became more and more reliant on Bird, and for two years he delivered MVP-type seasons, but, because his team wasn't as talented as other teams in the league, Bird never really stood a chance at winning the MVP or the championship (which makes evaluating those two seasons more difficult). Because the Lakers were so much better than the Celtics in 1987 and 1988, it's pretty tough calling 1988 a tie (but I still did). On the other hand, a lot of basketball experts would say Larry wins every year from 1979 through 1986, and Magic wins the rest (except for 1992, when he didn't play). If you count that way, Bird wins 7-5, with 1991-92 being tossed out because Magic didn't participate.
Kind of like judging a boxing match. One way gives Magic a slight edge. The other way Bird wins with a bit of breathing room.
It's all a matter of perspective, I guess.
bob
.
That's what Larry Bird said to Quinn Buckner a few hours after the Boston Celtics took game 7 of the 1984 Finals. Of course, we all know now who Larry was talking about. I'm about half-way through the HBO documentary. It is outstanding. Perhaps even better. Bird has his game face on throughout the entire show as he reflects back on the rivalry. Stoic, in the moment, the moment having occurred 20-30 years earlier.
Larry Bird was one hell of a competitor.
The amazing thing is so was that other guy.
You didn't have that with Russell-Chamberlain, as Wilt, lacking a killer instinct, didn't uphold his end of the bargain. In any event, during the 1980s, I thought Bird was the better player (a Celtics fan, I may have been slightly biased). Since about 2005, I've given the edge to Magic (Magic's team won the lion's share of the head-to-head match-ups, Magic won more rings, and Magic made it to more Finals).
Tonight, I thought I'd take a slightly different look--season by season.
1979-80: Tie. Bird won Rookie of the Year, Magic won the championship (Finals MVP).
1980-81: Bird. Bird gets the ring. Magic gets injured.
1981-82: Magic. Magic gets the ring by beating the team that beat the Celtics.
1982-83: Tie. Magic gets swept in the Finals, Bird's team quits on Fitch.
1983-84: Bird. MVP. Ring.
1984-85: Tie. Bird and Magic split the MVP and the ring.
1985-86: Bird. MVP, ring, swept the Lakers, Bird's team one of the best ever.
1986-87: Magic. Magic won MVP and a ring after pundits said the Lakers were washed up.
1987-88: Tie. Magic gets the ring, but this may have been Bird's best season.
1988-89: Magic. MVP. Bird injured.
1989-90: Magic. Magic gets the MVP. Bird had a good year, but not a great one.
1990-91: Magic. Lakers make it to the Finals. Bird injured again.
1991-92: Bird. Magic retired.
Magic wins, 5-4-4.
Tough duty making those calls.
After 1986, the Celtics became more and more reliant on Bird, and for two years he delivered MVP-type seasons, but, because his team wasn't as talented as other teams in the league, Bird never really stood a chance at winning the MVP or the championship (which makes evaluating those two seasons more difficult). Because the Lakers were so much better than the Celtics in 1987 and 1988, it's pretty tough calling 1988 a tie (but I still did). On the other hand, a lot of basketball experts would say Larry wins every year from 1979 through 1986, and Magic wins the rest (except for 1992, when he didn't play). If you count that way, Bird wins 7-5, with 1991-92 being tossed out because Magic didn't participate.
Kind of like judging a boxing match. One way gives Magic a slight edge. The other way Bird wins with a bit of breathing room.
It's all a matter of perspective, I guess.
bob
.
bobheckler- Posts : 62620
Join date : 2009-10-28
Re: Lex Nihil Novi - "I Got 'em. I Finally Got Him"
As much as I hate to suggest it, it seems to me that—with so much evidence on either side—the "tie" goes to the guy whose position enabled him to elevate the games of a larger number of his teammates more consistently. I believe that's the PG position.
However, there's also what might be called the "WOW" factor, which shouldn't be overlooked. Under the most severe pressure, Larry could make the most bodacious moves seem routine. Magic had the same quality (can anyone say, “Baby hook?), but I believe he exhibited it less often—at least in games against the Celtics.
So, although I believe direct player comparisons are, per se, ill-advised (in lieu of a more nasty term), I’d give it to Larry by a whisker.
Sam
However, there's also what might be called the "WOW" factor, which shouldn't be overlooked. Under the most severe pressure, Larry could make the most bodacious moves seem routine. Magic had the same quality (can anyone say, “Baby hook?), but I believe he exhibited it less often—at least in games against the Celtics.
So, although I believe direct player comparisons are, per se, ill-advised (in lieu of a more nasty term), I’d give it to Larry by a whisker.
Sam
Re: Lex Nihil Novi - "I Got 'em. I Finally Got Him"
And to add after playing
COACHING
Bird wins FAR AND AWAY
beat
COACHING
Bird wins FAR AND AWAY
beat
beat- Posts : 7032
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 71
Re: Lex Nihil Novi - "I Got 'em. I Finally Got Him"
I think Magic Johnson was alot of hype, the best player on those/his team was Kareem, Kareem is still never given enough credit for that Purple Rain....and his one big game as a scorer in 80 Finals clincher was never repeated again.
cowens/oldschool- Posts : 27706
Join date : 2009-10-18
Re: Lex Nihil Novi - "I Got 'em. I Finally Got Him"
I know I didn't watch every game but I don't ever remember Bird letting the 24 second clock run out late in a game in the finals like Magic did (not sure when but I know i saw it)
I don't recall Magic making or let alone even taking too many game winning shots, Bird on the other hand.......tons of um.
To compare them head to head year by year is questionable method at best for Birds final 3-4 years he was a shell of what he was the first 5-6 years.
I really don't know if there was any phase of the game that Magic was head and shoulders better than Bird. Bird was the better shooter and rebounder both played loose defense but were more team oriented in that respect and to say Magic is a better passer in minimal at best for he handled the ball more but I believe Bird was far more creative in passing.
Like the Belmont stakes yesterday the California entry in this comparison comes up short and I believe by a lot more than a few lengths.
In there absolute prime years.........Bird without a doubt.
beat
I don't recall Magic making or let alone even taking too many game winning shots, Bird on the other hand.......tons of um.
To compare them head to head year by year is questionable method at best for Birds final 3-4 years he was a shell of what he was the first 5-6 years.
I really don't know if there was any phase of the game that Magic was head and shoulders better than Bird. Bird was the better shooter and rebounder both played loose defense but were more team oriented in that respect and to say Magic is a better passer in minimal at best for he handled the ball more but I believe Bird was far more creative in passing.
Like the Belmont stakes yesterday the California entry in this comparison comes up short and I believe by a lot more than a few lengths.
In there absolute prime years.........Bird without a doubt.
beat
Last edited by beat on Mon Jun 09, 2014 10:20 am; edited 1 time in total
beat- Posts : 7032
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 71
Re: Lex Nihil Novi - "I Got 'em. I Finally Got Him"
I thought Bird was the more dominant up to 1987. Up to that year LA was more Kareem's team. When Magic was asked to step up and become not only the facilitator but also the go-to scorer he responded brilliantly.
Bird was the unquestioned Boston alpha dog virtually from day one.
In '87 and '88, as fantastic as Magic was, Bird's game peaked as he put together back to back seasons of 28 and 30 ppg with 50% FG, 40% threes, 90% FT's, 9 boards and over 6 assists. But already by the '88 playoffs, Bird was showing signs that his body was breaking down. He shot below 40% and averaged just 19 ppg as Detroit finally broke through defeating Boston in six games.
The next year Bird played only 10 games due to heel surgery. Then of course his back went out. He was a shadow of what he was his last three years.
I've heard Bird say that looking back on his career he should have retired after his 9th season, the last healthy one he had. I'm personally happy that he did not since even as a diminished player he had fantastic moments that still make me smile.
Bird was the unquestioned Boston alpha dog virtually from day one.
In '87 and '88, as fantastic as Magic was, Bird's game peaked as he put together back to back seasons of 28 and 30 ppg with 50% FG, 40% threes, 90% FT's, 9 boards and over 6 assists. But already by the '88 playoffs, Bird was showing signs that his body was breaking down. He shot below 40% and averaged just 19 ppg as Detroit finally broke through defeating Boston in six games.
The next year Bird played only 10 games due to heel surgery. Then of course his back went out. He was a shadow of what he was his last three years.
I've heard Bird say that looking back on his career he should have retired after his 9th season, the last healthy one he had. I'm personally happy that he did not since even as a diminished player he had fantastic moments that still make me smile.
Sloopjohnb- Posts : 638
Join date : 2013-12-29
Re: Lex Nihil Novi - "I Got 'em. I Finally Got Him"
I think Kareem did not get the recognition he should have for a few reasons.
1. Magic was a showman and the league ate that up at the time.
2. Bird did so many unbelievable things on the court that the fans just ate it up.
3. The league fed off Bird/Magic
4. Most importantly, Kareem was NOT a like able guy, so it was easy for Magic/Larry to reap all the accolades.
Rosalue
1. Magic was a showman and the league ate that up at the time.
2. Bird did so many unbelievable things on the court that the fans just ate it up.
3. The league fed off Bird/Magic
4. Most importantly, Kareem was NOT a like able guy, so it was easy for Magic/Larry to reap all the accolades.
Rosalue
RosalieTCeltics- Posts : 41267
Join date : 2009-10-17
Age : 77
Re: Lex Nihil Novi - "I Got 'em. I Finally Got Him"
I think Kareem was so consistently great that people sometimes took him for granted. That skyhook was so reliable that it was almost monotonous.
Sloopjohnb- Posts : 638
Join date : 2013-12-29
Similar topics
» Lex Nihil Novi - 34, 18, 9, and 3
» Lex Nihil Novi - 23, 11, 5, 5, & 3
» Lex Nihil Novi - 32, 11, & 5
» Lex Nihil Novi - Does It Get Any Better?
» Lex Nihil Novi - How Sweep It Is
» Lex Nihil Novi - 23, 11, 5, 5, & 3
» Lex Nihil Novi - 32, 11, & 5
» Lex Nihil Novi - Does It Get Any Better?
» Lex Nihil Novi - How Sweep It Is
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum