Lex Nihil Novi - Bird Was The Word
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
Lex Nihil Novi - Bird Was The Word
Bird was the Word
MAY 1986
A carefree Billy Cunningham sat at courtside prior to Game 4 of the Eastern Conference Finals, rhapsodizing about the Boston Celtics.
"The Celtics are on ice skates right now, and they are watching the Lakers, who are running in sand," he said.
Three hours later, the Celtics had skated to a series sweep over the Bucks, while the plodding Lakers had fallen face down on the beach, losing a game to the Houston Rockets that put them down, three games to one, in the Western Conference finals. All season long, basketball fans nationwide had geared their thinking toward the inevitability of a Celtics-Lakers series. Now it's starting to look as if the only inevitability is the Celtics -- period.
They have played three series and have come within four minutes of sweeping them all. They have won games every way imaginable. They have survived a man scoring a playoff-record 63 points in one game; they have outscored a good team by a 36-6 margin in one quarter; they have held another good team to 12 points in the first quarter; they have beaten people by running; they have beaten people by powering the ball inside; they have beaten people by bombarding them with outside shooting, specifically, three-point shots; they have beaten people by passing the ball better than any team has in a decade; and they have won games by simply giving the ball to Larry Bird, stepping back and letting him orchestrate.
Talk about Bill Walton, talk about Jerry Sichting, talk about the flowering of Danny Ainge, talk about Kevin McHale's improved passing, talk about whatever you want, but the fact remains that one huge difference between the Celtics of today and the Celtics of a year ago is the basic status of Larry Bird. When he is ready to play, the Celtics have an unmatchable weapon.
His weekend performance in Milwaukee enhanced the growing legend. It was as if on Saturday he painted one half of the Sistine Chapel, and on Sunday he painted the other. He sliced up the Bucks on Saturday with 13 assists, all but one old-fashioned, completely legitimate assists for layups -- not bogus, 1980s assists when some guy drops in a 20-footer. He overpowered them on the boards with a 13-rebound second half. And he made the big momentum-switching play of the game when he went diving into a pile of bodies to secure a loose ball and wound up feeding McHale for a layup while sitting on the floor.
The next day revealed a different Bird. He went into the fourth period with a quiet 13 points, and he came out with a barrage of long-distance shooting unrivaled in playoff competition. His last four baskets were three-pointers -- two for real and two for show -- and when the last shot fell softly through the net, it meant he had outscored the Bucks in the fourth period. Passing, rebounding, shooting, hustling, defending, improvising . . . he has it in his powers to influence a game in whatever direction is necessary.
"I hope," said Don Nelson after Sunday's game, "all the other Celtics realize what a privilege it is to play with Larry Bird. They are very fortunate guys."
bob
.
MAY 1986
A carefree Billy Cunningham sat at courtside prior to Game 4 of the Eastern Conference Finals, rhapsodizing about the Boston Celtics.
"The Celtics are on ice skates right now, and they are watching the Lakers, who are running in sand," he said.
Three hours later, the Celtics had skated to a series sweep over the Bucks, while the plodding Lakers had fallen face down on the beach, losing a game to the Houston Rockets that put them down, three games to one, in the Western Conference finals. All season long, basketball fans nationwide had geared their thinking toward the inevitability of a Celtics-Lakers series. Now it's starting to look as if the only inevitability is the Celtics -- period.
They have played three series and have come within four minutes of sweeping them all. They have won games every way imaginable. They have survived a man scoring a playoff-record 63 points in one game; they have outscored a good team by a 36-6 margin in one quarter; they have held another good team to 12 points in the first quarter; they have beaten people by running; they have beaten people by powering the ball inside; they have beaten people by bombarding them with outside shooting, specifically, three-point shots; they have beaten people by passing the ball better than any team has in a decade; and they have won games by simply giving the ball to Larry Bird, stepping back and letting him orchestrate.
Talk about Bill Walton, talk about Jerry Sichting, talk about the flowering of Danny Ainge, talk about Kevin McHale's improved passing, talk about whatever you want, but the fact remains that one huge difference between the Celtics of today and the Celtics of a year ago is the basic status of Larry Bird. When he is ready to play, the Celtics have an unmatchable weapon.
His weekend performance in Milwaukee enhanced the growing legend. It was as if on Saturday he painted one half of the Sistine Chapel, and on Sunday he painted the other. He sliced up the Bucks on Saturday with 13 assists, all but one old-fashioned, completely legitimate assists for layups -- not bogus, 1980s assists when some guy drops in a 20-footer. He overpowered them on the boards with a 13-rebound second half. And he made the big momentum-switching play of the game when he went diving into a pile of bodies to secure a loose ball and wound up feeding McHale for a layup while sitting on the floor.
The next day revealed a different Bird. He went into the fourth period with a quiet 13 points, and he came out with a barrage of long-distance shooting unrivaled in playoff competition. His last four baskets were three-pointers -- two for real and two for show -- and when the last shot fell softly through the net, it meant he had outscored the Bucks in the fourth period. Passing, rebounding, shooting, hustling, defending, improvising . . . he has it in his powers to influence a game in whatever direction is necessary.
"I hope," said Don Nelson after Sunday's game, "all the other Celtics realize what a privilege it is to play with Larry Bird. They are very fortunate guys."
bob
.
bobheckler- Posts : 62527
Join date : 2009-10-28
Re: Lex Nihil Novi - Bird Was The Word
Larry was better than lebumm James thinks he is...
As celtics fans we should never forget how lucky we have been in terms of those who have put on our teams jerseys...
As celtics fans we should never forget how lucky we have been in terms of those who have put on our teams jerseys...
Matty- Posts : 4562
Join date : 2009-10-18
Re: Lex Nihil Novi - Bird Was The Word
Larry was physically and mentally tougher, Lebron should be a much better rebounder than Bird, hes not near as physical. Bird was a banger on defense in the Charles Oakley mold, he rebounded by position, hands and angles. Bird's outside game is better, in his era they didn't shot as many 3's, the game was still about inside play and lay ups. If Bird was playing today and they told him to shoot more 3's? fouhgeetabout it. Look at all the legendary clutch shots Bird has hit on video, where are Lebrons? Bird got up for the Hawks and Blazers, I think he liked schooling Dominique and Drexler, the supposed leapers/athletes, ofcourse he also had his way with Dr J and Pippen. Lebron's athleticism Bird would enjoy beating guys like that all over the floor, inside, outside....
cowens/oldschool- Posts : 27667
Join date : 2009-10-18
Re: Lex Nihil Novi - Bird Was The Word
Bird often treated the three as a psychological weapon. It was no accident that he shot a lot of his threes from right in front of the opponent's bench. And more often than not the shot was either to blunt the other team's rally or a momentum changer or the final nail in the coffin of a Celtic rally.
In 1981's final's game six the Rockets were trying to stage a desperate rally when Bird drilled a three to take all the wind out of Houston sails. You could see the guys on the Rocket bench just deflate. Hoist up banner #14.
In 1986 Bird launched one of the most arrogant 'eff you threes to impress on Houston the stark reality that no way, no how were they getting back into the game. With the C's already up by around 20, Bird pounced on the loose ball after a broken play near the elbow with the clock running down. Instead of working for a shot from there he stunned the Houston defenders by dribbling away from the basket to launch a turnaround three from--you guessed it--right in front of the Houston bench.
Swish. The crowd goes absolutely ape; Houston has its heart ripped out. Pop the champagne. Though I bet that Bird had a beer afterwards.
In Bird's 60 point game, his last couple of baskets came from right in front of the Hawks's bench. That's why we have the priceless footage of the Atlanta players falling off the bench in amazement.
I've seen Lebron and others take threes for that dagger-in-the-heart effect. But Bird had the most exquisite sense of timing.
In 1981's final's game six the Rockets were trying to stage a desperate rally when Bird drilled a three to take all the wind out of Houston sails. You could see the guys on the Rocket bench just deflate. Hoist up banner #14.
In 1986 Bird launched one of the most arrogant 'eff you threes to impress on Houston the stark reality that no way, no how were they getting back into the game. With the C's already up by around 20, Bird pounced on the loose ball after a broken play near the elbow with the clock running down. Instead of working for a shot from there he stunned the Houston defenders by dribbling away from the basket to launch a turnaround three from--you guessed it--right in front of the Houston bench.
Swish. The crowd goes absolutely ape; Houston has its heart ripped out. Pop the champagne. Though I bet that Bird had a beer afterwards.
In Bird's 60 point game, his last couple of baskets came from right in front of the Hawks's bench. That's why we have the priceless footage of the Atlanta players falling off the bench in amazement.
I've seen Lebron and others take threes for that dagger-in-the-heart effect. But Bird had the most exquisite sense of timing.
Sloopjohnb- Posts : 638
Join date : 2013-12-29
Similar topics
» Lex Nihil Novi - Bird and McHale
» Lex Nihil Novi - Red on Russell vs Bird
» Lex Nihil Novi - Another Bird Renoir: 24, 18, and 13 (WTF?!)
» Lex Nihil Novi - Bird Goes for 32, 18, 9, & 4 at the Forum
» Lex Nihil Novi - Bird Was Overrated
» Lex Nihil Novi - Red on Russell vs Bird
» Lex Nihil Novi - Another Bird Renoir: 24, 18, and 13 (WTF?!)
» Lex Nihil Novi - Bird Goes for 32, 18, 9, & 4 at the Forum
» Lex Nihil Novi - Bird Was Overrated
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum