3 Down 79 Wins To Go!

Chicago Bulls Welcome To TD Garden, Meet Our 2009 - 2010 Boston Celtics!!!!!! ..........RELOADED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WOW........ What a Blow-Out!!!

Stars of the Game

First Half: The Second Team. Outscored Chicago's bench 19 -7. kudo's to Daniels, he really started to get into the offensive flow, and Williams with rebounds and some offense. Could Williams be our next Leon Powe? Looking good!

Third Quarter: First Team. Kudo's to "The Big Ticket"! Finding his touch from the outside and that Slam dunk lite up the House! Ray started to light it up, looking like his old self and Paul looking really sharp from 3 pt land! Rondo with an amazing 16 assists. Way to go guys!!

Fourth Quarter: Second Team with Eddie Mansion leading the way with a total of 22 pts in 22 minutes. Williams with some strong rebounding and good foul shooting.

The overall key to our win was tremendous ball movement by everyone. Left, Right and into the Inside. Just tremendous play.
Oh, how about that Defense!!!!

NEXT: New Orleans with Paul and still one of my favorites of 2008 CHAMPIONS Posey.

112288

Sheldon is beginning to look more and more like a top 5 pick after all. A legitimate big banger with a nose for the ball, likes rough and tumble, can distribute and looks to have a midrange game. Hits his FTs. More upside than Leon... provided he has Leon's consistency and work ethic.

GC

GC

Shelden is my new fav guy..."Be healed!"

59 wins to go?

so we will lost 10?

69 gyso!!!

beat

Hi,
Just a questions to those who paid attention: is Perk ok?
He was kind of quiet: 19min, 4 reb
Thank you very much,
AK

beat wrote:59 wins to go?

so we will lost 10?

69 gyso!!!

beat

Too much partying after win, sorry, will correct to 79 wins.

112288

I was wondering about that 112288....I was thinking, geez we did that last year....let's go for at least 72 this year....

LACELTFAN wrote:I was wondering about that 112288....I was thinking, geez we did that last year....let's go for at least 72 this year....

72 wins! Boy you are thinking low!!! Only kidding, would that not be great!

112288

sinus007 wrote:Hi,
Just a questions to those who paid attention: is Perk ok?
He was kind of quiet: 19min, 4 reb
Thank you very much,
AK

Sinus:

KG, RA and Perk all played less than 25 minutes last night.

I hadn't realized that Perk played less than 20 but considering the blow out, who was keeping track of PT.

No indications that he was hurt at all. He didn't look injured, 4 for 5 from the floor and a number (3) of blocks.

4 PF's so maybe he got into a bit of early foul trouble.

GC

Sinus,

Perk had some early foul trouble and wound up not playing even 20 minutes. Yet he had three blocks and four boards. And he's increasing playing a more opportunistic role in the offense with occasional pops from 10-12 feet and being a pick-and-roll option. They have so many contributors that, in virtually every game, there will be come who won't put up great stats because there are so many stats to go around. But Perk's been pretty consistent, especially on the defensive end where he is most needed.

Sam

Sam wrote:Sinus,

Perk had some early foul trouble and wound up not playing even 20 minutes. Yet he had three blocks and four boards. And he's increasing playing a more opportunistic role in the offense with occasional pops from 10-12 feet and being a pick-and-roll option. They have so many contributors that, in virtually every game, there will be come who won't put up great stats because there are so many stats to go around. But Perk's been pretty consistent, especially on the defensive end where he is most needed.

Sam

Sam, I think you hit it on the head. I believe everyone's statistic's will be down because there is so much versatility and depth to the team. The key to keeping everyone happy is for them to buy into playing as a team and winning a World Championship. The only thing that will kill the Goose with the Golden Egg is individual greed. Perhaps that is why Marbury never came back! The chemistry would not have been the same.

112288

Marbury was offered a 2 million contract, down 90% from last year's salary... if my higher math is correct.

That he would refuse that and not play at all anywhere speaks volumes about where is head is. He was lucky to get an offer period.

I am not at all sure that I would call it "greed." 2 mill is not chump change. Ego maybe.

BTW Evony is back.

Somebody click on it and tell me what the scoop is.

GC

What I mean by greed is playing time and ball hogging and not playing into the team system. marbury still thinks he is a starter and things revolve around him. His time has come and gone. He is thru! I call it personnel selfishness, not $ monetary greed.

112288