IRISH COFFEE: 5 AWFUL CELTICS STATISTICS ONE GOOD

3 posters

Go down

IRISH COFFEE: 5 AWFUL CELTICS STATISTICS ONE GOOD Empty IRISH COFFEE: 5 AWFUL CELTICS STATISTICS ONE GOOD

Post by 112288 Tue Feb 21, 2012 7:48 pm

IRISH COFFEE: 5 AWFUL CELTICS STATISTICS
By Ben Rohrbac


Following a 89-73 loss to the Mavericks, the Celtics dropped to 15-16 and the Eastern Conference’s eighth seed (just two games ahead of the lowly Cavaliers) — the worst start to any season of the Kevin Garnett era.

Facing the Thunder on Wednesday night without the suspended Rajon Rondo and possibly sans KG (personal reasons), things don’t stand to get any better, especially with injuries to bigs Jermaine O’Neal (wrist), Chris Wilcox (adductor) and Brandon Bass (knee).

Should all be unavailable in the team’s final game before the All-Star break, the C’s starting center midway through the 2011-12 season will come down to a choice between rookies Greg Stiemsma and JaJuan Johnson. Generally, that’s the kind of thing that happens when a team enters the year with an injury-plagued 15-year veteran as its only established center. Not to mention Kendrick Perkins will be starting for the opposing team.

In some respect Celtics president Danny Ainge had to see this coming, although nobody could have expected them to be this bad. Here are five shockingly awful statistics the 2011-12 Celtics have produced.

Somehow, Kevin Garnett, Doc Rivers and the Celtics have to figure out how to improve their rebounding.

1. In the first four seasons since the arrival of Garnett and Ray Allen prior to the 2007-08 season, the Celtics never lost 6-of-7 games. This year, they’ve had two such stretches in two months (Jan. 6-20 and the present “run”).
2. Dropping to 26th among 30 NBA teams in points scored, the Celtics haven’t scored more than 95 points in eight straight games. In the shot clock era (since the 1954-55 season), the Celtics have had only three other streaks of such woeful offense: From Dec. 30, 2000 to Jan. 12, 2001 (8 games), from Jan. 21 to Feb. 4, 2006 (9 games) and from Oct. 31 to Nov. 26, 2003 (13 games). Two of those teams failed to make the playoffs, and the other got swept in the first round of the 2003 NBA playoffs.

3. After allowing 13 offensive rebounds in Detroit on Monday night, the Celtics have now allowed 11 or more offensive boards in seven straight games. That has only happened one other time in this current Big Three Era, from Dec. 31, 2010 to Jan. 10, 2011 — a seven-game stretch during which Glen Davis started for an injured KG.

4. The Celtics have also not shot better than 50 percent as a team in any of the seven games. That’s only happened four times since the start of the 2007 season. It’s now happened twice in the last two months, from Jan. 1 to Jan. 20 (10 games) and from Feb. 9 to the present. Not coincidentally, those two streaks have coincided with the two 1-6 stretches this season.

5. The Celtics rank dead last in the NBA in rebounding. Eight of the last nine teams to finish the regular season last on the glass failed to reach the playoffs, and the ninth team (the 2004-05 Grizzlies) got swept in the first round. Those nine clubs had a combined .363 winning percentage.

Really, the only thing the Celtics have going for them is the fact that their defense has ranked at or near the top of the league in points allowed (they currently allow 87.5 points per game, second to the Bulls at 87.3).

Since 2000, only four of the 12 teams that led the league in defense also ranked as low as the current Celtics in offense (26th). Those four teams won a combined two playoff games, and none got out of the first round.

The good news? The 2003-04 Pistons owned the league’s best defense, ranked 24th in points scored and won the NBA championship. Of course, that team ranked in the top half of the league in rebounding. So, that leaves Danny Ainge one option if the Celtics have any interest in salvaging this season before entering full-blown rebuilding mode: sign Rasheed Wallace Find somebody who can rebound the damn ball.

112288
112288
112288

Posts : 7855
Join date : 2009-10-16

Back to top Go down

IRISH COFFEE: 5 AWFUL CELTICS STATISTICS ONE GOOD Empty Re: IRISH COFFEE: 5 AWFUL CELTICS STATISTICS ONE GOOD

Post by steve3344 Tue Feb 21, 2012 8:26 pm

The last point in this guy's article about how bad our rebounding is recommends that the Celtics sign Rasheed Wallace??? A 6'11" guy who plays like he's 6'1" and used to run away from rebounds?

No thanks.

steve3344

Posts : 4167
Join date : 2009-10-27
Age : 73

Back to top Go down

IRISH COFFEE: 5 AWFUL CELTICS STATISTICS ONE GOOD Empty Re: IRISH COFFEE: 5 AWFUL CELTICS STATISTICS ONE GOOD

Post by 112288 Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:59 pm

Steve on the original, he had his name crossed out but did not take on the copy over.

112288
112288
112288

Posts : 7855
Join date : 2009-10-16

Back to top Go down

IRISH COFFEE: 5 AWFUL CELTICS STATISTICS ONE GOOD Empty Re: IRISH COFFEE: 5 AWFUL CELTICS STATISTICS ONE GOOD

Post by MDCelticsFan Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:16 am

The new players, Bass & Pietrus, plus the supposedly reconditioned Jermaine O'Neal are proving to be more In & Out than an old Kevin Klein movie. Too bad Celtic fans, ownership, and management can't take this season's results to H & R Block to see what was missed when the initial assessment was being filed for this team. Who knows, if we get a real slick tax preparer, the team's fans, ownership and management, while not getting a do-over for the season, may be able to write it off as a loss and get a tax credit. At least it is known that big bucks (not Milwaukee) will be coming off the books at season's end. It's sorta' like castor oil, you just gotta' hold your nose and swallow with the knowledge it will do you some good in the long run.

MD!

MDCelticsFan

Posts : 1314
Join date : 2009-11-03
Age : 72

Back to top Go down

IRISH COFFEE: 5 AWFUL CELTICS STATISTICS ONE GOOD Empty Re: IRISH COFFEE: 5 AWFUL CELTICS STATISTICS ONE GOOD

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum