"Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
+9
swedeinestonia
NYCelt
mrkleen09
beat
Pumpsie Green
sinus007
bobc33
jeb
steve3344
13 posters
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
"Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=AvTa0FOkOtcfGvPzaTM2Y6C8vLYF?slug=mc-heatceltics041710
steve3344- Posts : 4167
Join date : 2009-10-27
Age : 73
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
nba refs and sterns dream finals 1 celtics o yet again if this happens
jeb- Posts : 6165
Join date : 2009-10-16
Age : 59
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
I think Richardson calling the two Cs actresses just may fire this series up to a melting point.
_________________
I have good vibes about this team, this season and this Forum!
bobc33- Posts : 13666
Join date : 2009-10-16
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
Hi,
Unfortunately it looks like they want to make sure that nothing goes beyond trash talk. Therefore solution: punish a visible figure to make a statement. Unfortunately, again, they won't punish the instigator. Refs spent quite some time watching the replays of the whole episode: they didn't pickup (or didn't want to) on PP being shoved, KG being provoked, Heat bench players pushing and shoving. Somehow, I doubt that Stern will put clamps on both sides.
I wonder what he'd do if Kobe and LJ shoved each other...
I hope the absence of KG will crank Celtics RPMs into the red.
AK
Unfortunately it looks like they want to make sure that nothing goes beyond trash talk. Therefore solution: punish a visible figure to make a statement. Unfortunately, again, they won't punish the instigator. Refs spent quite some time watching the replays of the whole episode: they didn't pickup (or didn't want to) on PP being shoved, KG being provoked, Heat bench players pushing and shoving. Somehow, I doubt that Stern will put clamps on both sides.
I wonder what he'd do if Kobe and LJ shoved each other...
I hope the absence of KG will crank Celtics RPMs into the red.
AK
sinus007- Posts : 2631
Join date : 2009-10-22
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
pierce was fouled twice on the play. pushed into the heat bench. Richardson come into the area talking shit. KG was trying to protect his teammate.
Richardson is now a marked man and better watch his actress ass
Richardson is now a marked man and better watch his actress ass
jeb- Posts : 6165
Join date : 2009-10-16
Age : 59
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
jeb65 wrote:pierce was fouled twice on the play. pushed into the heat bench. Richardson come into the area talking shit. KG was trying to protect his teammate.
Richardson is now a marked man and better watch his actress ass
Richardson is a foolish punk. He should concentrate more on basketball and less on name calling
Pumpsie Green- Posts : 1333
Join date : 2009-11-20
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
Pumpsie
I may be looking at this through green glasses but it really seemed to me even with the elbow that kg was just trying to maintain space for his teammate whom was UNDER the enemy bench. He knows PP and Rich's history and he was afraid Rich might do something more than talk.
Bird would have choked the punk.
I may be looking at this through green glasses but it really seemed to me even with the elbow that kg was just trying to maintain space for his teammate whom was UNDER the enemy bench. He knows PP and Rich's history and he was afraid Rich might do something more than talk.
Bird would have choked the punk.
jeb- Posts : 6165
Join date : 2009-10-16
Age : 59
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
jeb65 wrote:Pumpsie
I may be looking at this through green glasses but it really seemed to me even with the elbow that kg was just trying to maintain space for his teammate whom was UNDER the enemy bench. He knows PP and Rich's history and he was afraid Rich might do something more than talk.
Bird would have choked the punk.
Apparently Richardson was over there calling KG and PP pansies of some sort, "actresses" I think was the word he used. Too bad KG didn't get him in the teeth. I would have enjoyed seeing Richardson's teeth bouncing on the parquet like chicklets.
Pumpsie Green- Posts : 1333
Join date : 2009-11-20
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
Pumpsie Green wrote:jeb65 wrote:Pumpsie
I may be looking at this through green glasses but it really seemed to me even with the elbow that kg was just trying to maintain space for his teammate whom was UNDER the enemy bench. He knows PP and Rich's history and he was afraid Rich might do something more than talk.
Bird would have choked the punk.
Apparently Richardson was over there calling KG and PP pansies of some sort, "actresses" I think was the word he used. Too bad KG didn't get him in the teeth. I would have enjoyed seeing Richardson's teeth bouncing on the parquet like chicklets.
Then I hope you would have enjoyed seeing KG suspended for two games and Miami knocking the Celtics out in the first round.
steve3344- Posts : 4167
Join date : 2009-10-27
Age : 73
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
steve 33
If that's pointed at me go fly a kite. If the nba suspends KG for two games it will enforce its own idiocy and the Celts will be fine. If not...the better team wins a seven game series every time and I wil be ready to support the team I love next year.
Kg messed up but he was trying to protect a falen teammate. Ask yourself what Bird would have done.
If that's pointed at me go fly a kite. If the nba suspends KG for two games it will enforce its own idiocy and the Celts will be fine. If not...the better team wins a seven game series every time and I wil be ready to support the team I love next year.
Kg messed up but he was trying to protect a falen teammate. Ask yourself what Bird would have done.
jeb- Posts : 6165
Join date : 2009-10-16
Age : 59
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
steve3344 wrote:Pumpsie Green wrote:jeb65 wrote:Pumpsie
I may be looking at this through green glasses but it really seemed to me even with the elbow that kg was just trying to maintain space for his teammate whom was UNDER the enemy bench. He knows PP and Rich's history and he was afraid Rich might do something more than talk.
Bird would have choked the punk.
Apparently Richardson was over there calling KG and PP pansies of some sort, "actresses" I think was the word he used. Too bad KG didn't get him in the teeth. I would have enjoyed seeing Richardson's teeth bouncing on the parquet like chicklets.
Then I hope you would have enjoyed seeing KG suspended for two games and Miami knocking the Celtics out in the first round.
Team mates stick together; they protect each other. I support what KG did. And I don't think the NBA is going to suspend him based on what I was seeing out there
Pumpsie Green- Posts : 1333
Join date : 2009-11-20
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
No punches
No suspension
IMHO
beat
No suspension
IMHO
beat
beat- Posts : 7032
Join date : 2009-10-13
Age : 70
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
jeb65 wrote:steve 33
If that's pointed at me go fly a kite. If the nba suspends KG for two games it will enforce its own idiocy and the Celts will be fine. If not...the better team wins a seven game series every time and I wil be ready to support the team I love next year.
Kg messed up but he was trying to protect a falen teammate. Ask yourself what Bird would have done.
It was a direct response to pumpsie's post, which as you see, my post follows his.
steve3344- Posts : 4167
Join date : 2009-10-27
Age : 73
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
Pumpsie Green wrote:Team mates stick together; they protect each other. I support what KG did. And I don't think the NBA is going to suspend him based on what I was seeing out there
For the first time in a while I am glad to see some pro Celtics fire in you Pumpsie. Really happy to read this and I agree 100%.
When a player is on the ground, especially in front of another teams bench - it is the refs job to PROTECT that player. If they dont do it (which those three blind mice last night were not) then it is up to your teammates to have your back.
Yeah, KG. Yeah, Pumpsie. Go Celtics. Boo NBA for the pathetic ruling here. Either you suspend Richardson AND KG or you suspend no one. This is total BS.
mrkleen09- Posts : 3873
Join date : 2009-10-16
Age : 55
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
mrkleen09 wrote:Pumpsie Green wrote:Team mates stick together; they protect each other. I support what KG did. And I don't think the NBA is going to suspend him based on what I was seeing out there
For the first time in a while I am glad to see some pro Celtics fire in you Pumpsie. Really happy to read this and I agree 100%.
When a player is on the ground, especially in front of another teams bench - it is the refs job to PROTECT that player. If they dont do it (which those three blind mice last night were not) then it is up to your teammates to have your back.
Yeah, KG. Yeah, Pumpsie. Go Celtics. Boo NBA for the pathetic ruling here. Either you suspend Richardson AND KG or you suspend no one. This is total BS.
Mrkleen, I have ALWAYS been a Celtics fan. I am disappointed in them when the effort is not there, but I never wavered in wanting the best for them. Yeah, KG got suspended. I am still proud of what he did to that punk Richardson who stood over PP like an A-Hole spouting trash. When a player is down, you move away if he is not on your team. You don't come up and bad mouth a guy when he is down. KG is out for game 2; I hope the Celtics kick some butt.
Pumpsie Green- Posts : 1333
Join date : 2009-11-20
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
beat wrote:No punches
No suspension
IMHO
beat
beat,
If Garnett's elbowing was either intentional or reckless it is a Flagrant 2 which means he has to be suspended for the following game.
Guest- Guest
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
Richardson was fined $25,000.
I thought KG was going to be suspended as soon as I saw the elbows fly, and expressed that concern in the Game On thread.
No doubt the two flying elbows needs to be addressed and a one game suspension is normally the penalty for a double technical like that one. The suspension is correct in this case. The fine on Richardson at least acknowledges his role.
During the post game press conference KG did own up to the fact that he should have kept his cool and has to know better.
To me it looks like one of those times doing the wrong thing is actually the right action. As others here have said, you don't just stand by when a teammate is down like that. You could make the argument KG should have covered Pierce and shoved others away instead of letting the elbows fly, but he had to react fast and in the heat of the moment he protected his player. I've got no problem with the fact that he acted quickly despite his unfortunate choice of method.
I expect this will serve to fuel the Celtics fire. The rest of this series is not going to be pleasant for Mr. Richardson.
I thought KG was going to be suspended as soon as I saw the elbows fly, and expressed that concern in the Game On thread.
No doubt the two flying elbows needs to be addressed and a one game suspension is normally the penalty for a double technical like that one. The suspension is correct in this case. The fine on Richardson at least acknowledges his role.
During the post game press conference KG did own up to the fact that he should have kept his cool and has to know better.
To me it looks like one of those times doing the wrong thing is actually the right action. As others here have said, you don't just stand by when a teammate is down like that. You could make the argument KG should have covered Pierce and shoved others away instead of letting the elbows fly, but he had to react fast and in the heat of the moment he protected his player. I've got no problem with the fact that he acted quickly despite his unfortunate choice of method.
I expect this will serve to fuel the Celtics fire. The rest of this series is not going to be pleasant for Mr. Richardson.
NYCelt- Posts : 10628
Join date : 2009-10-12
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
Ainge needs to get involved in this. If he does not stand up to Stern and all his garbage I lose some respect for him. Have fun Richardson you woke up the dragon..he was sleeping. He's awake...sleep tight you instigating punk.
jeb- Posts : 6165
Join date : 2009-10-16
Age : 59
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
Why are so many blaming Richardson?
Yes, he acted like a punk but if Garnett didn't lose his cool, we wouldn't even be talking about this.
The Celtics had a great comeback and an impressive win.
Garnett needs to be blamed for his actions, not Richardson.
Yes, he acted like a punk but if Garnett didn't lose his cool, we wouldn't even be talking about this.
The Celtics had a great comeback and an impressive win.
Garnett needs to be blamed for his actions, not Richardson.
Guest- Guest
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
TJ it is the refs job to protect an injured player. They did not do that. We are circling the damn wagons which is exactly what you would do if it was Kobe down with some shitheads boot next to his head underneath a very hostile bench. Believe what you wish. But this is about the refs to me.
jeb- Posts : 6165
Join date : 2009-10-16
Age : 59
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
tjmakz wrote:Why are so many blaming Richardson?
Yes, he acted like a punk but if Garnett didn't lose his cool, we wouldn't even be talking about this.
The Celtics had a great comeback and an impressive win.
Garnett needs to be blamed for his actions, not Richardson.
Because Richardson came and stood over an injured player spouting smack. You just don't do that. You want to talk smack you do it on the floor during the game to healthy guys. It was bush league. I saw KG saying something to him before the elbows flew, probably telling him to shut the hell up. If I am Rivers, I bring in someone like Sheldon or Scal to lay out Richardson when he drives to the hoop-just once-to send the message that he is a punk and his actions won't be tolerated.
Pumpsie Green- Posts : 1333
Join date : 2009-11-20
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
jeb,
The refs we're trying to break it up. How was this about the refs?
If KG didn't throw an elbow this is a non-issue. If there was some pushing and shoving, it's no big deal and KG could be commended for what he did.
Richardson wasn't trying to hurt 'injured' Pierce.
You can't give garnett a pass by blaming the refs.
I guess you need to believe what you do, but I doubt most open-minded Celtics fans would agree with you.
The refs we're trying to break it up. How was this about the refs?
If KG didn't throw an elbow this is a non-issue. If there was some pushing and shoving, it's no big deal and KG could be commended for what he did.
Richardson wasn't trying to hurt 'injured' Pierce.
You can't give garnett a pass by blaming the refs.
I guess you need to believe what you do, but I doubt most open-minded Celtics fans would agree with you.
Guest- Guest
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
tjmakz wrote:jeb,
The refs we're trying to break it up. How was this about the refs?
If KG didn't throw an elbow this is a non-issue. If there was some pushing and shoving, it's no big deal and KG could be commended for what he did.
Richardson wasn't trying to hurt 'injured' Pierce.
You can't give garnett a pass by blaming the refs.
I guess you need to believe what you do, but I doubt most open-minded Celtics fans would agree with you.
First of all, your Lakers glasses are so colored with yellow and purple, you cant even see out of them TJ.
Pierce was fouled TWICE before he fell into the front row and banged his shoulder into a metal chair. If the refs had made one of those two calls...NONE of this would have happened.
Second, once Pierce was down - Richardson has no business going to try and yell at him (or KG) - he should immediately move towards his own bench - and any actions that put him in a position where he is staring down on an injured player - yelling no less, should automatically brand him the instigator and anything that happens after that, he is to blame for.
How about Magloire coming off the bench to grab Garnett? Isnt that an AUTOMATIC SUSPENSION?
No one is giving Garnett a pass....but it is either an suspension for KG AND Richardson - or it is neither. Even a Laker fan cant possibly defend the instigator getting off with a fine, while the guy defending his teammate gets suspended. That is BUSH LEAGUE even by your standards.
mrkleen09- Posts : 3873
Join date : 2009-10-16
Age : 55
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
mrkleen,
Garnett's elbowing of Richardson can't be excused by a missed foul call or Richardson acting like a punk. Why can't you just admit that Garnett lost his temper and now his team will pay for it?
I don't know about Magliore but the play was on the Heat's side of the court. Magliore should not have been suspended if he was in the bench 'area'. There is not a pre-determined distance from the bench that determines a suspension.
Richardson did nothing to deserve a suspension. KG has been in the league a long time. He should know that if you throw a punch or a flagrant elbow you will sit out the next game. This was a pretty easy call for the NBA...sorry....
Garnett's elbowing of Richardson can't be excused by a missed foul call or Richardson acting like a punk. Why can't you just admit that Garnett lost his temper and now his team will pay for it?
I don't know about Magliore but the play was on the Heat's side of the court. Magliore should not have been suspended if he was in the bench 'area'. There is not a pre-determined distance from the bench that determines a suspension.
Richardson did nothing to deserve a suspension. KG has been in the league a long time. He should know that if you throw a punch or a flagrant elbow you will sit out the next game. This was a pretty easy call for the NBA...sorry....
Guest- Guest
Re: "Celtics could lose Garnett for Game 2"
tjmakz wrote:mrkleen,
Garnett's elbowing of Richardson can't be excused by a missed foul call or Richardson acting like a punk. Why can't you just admit that Garnett lost his temper and now his team will pay for it?
I don't know about Magliore but the play was on the Heat's side of the court. Magliore should not have been suspended if he was in the bench 'area'. There is not a pre-determined distance from the bench that determines a suspension.
Richardson did nothing to deserve a suspension. KG has been in the league a long time. He should know that if you throw a punch or a flagrant elbow you will sit out the next game. This was a pretty easy call for the NBA...sorry....
Did you miss the part where I said that KG should have been suspended?
Richardson did more than 'act like a punk' - he instigated what turned into a multiple player fight. If you cant see that, you must have not watched the game.
I dont have a problem with the NBA sticking to their rules - but if you suspend KG - you have to also suspend Richardson. The fact that they fined him $25,000 says they ACKNOWLEDGE that he was wrong...but somehow, dont think that starting the fight is as bad as finishing it. That I dont get...and clearly that is an uneven way to administer the rules.
mrkleen09- Posts : 3873
Join date : 2009-10-16
Age : 55
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» ANNOUNCING A SEASON-LONG CONTEST ON OUR CELTICS "GAME-ON" THREAD
» Post Game Thread Celtics lose Game 1 to Lakers 102-89 6/3/2010
» Post Game Thread Celtics lose Game 5 to the Magic 113-92 5/26/2010
» Charles Oakley calls Kevin Garnett "a phony tough guy"
» Let's not lose to the "Biggest Losers"
» Post Game Thread Celtics lose Game 1 to Lakers 102-89 6/3/2010
» Post Game Thread Celtics lose Game 5 to the Magic 113-92 5/26/2010
» Charles Oakley calls Kevin Garnett "a phony tough guy"
» Let's not lose to the "Biggest Losers"
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|