Projecting The Boston Celtics’ Rookie Impacts

rambone wrote:You like the tried and true method under old rules that no longer apply.

And get a look at who had the worst real offensive plus minus among all NBA centers, while KO was second best.

Take a look:
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/page/2/sort/ORPM/position/9

you are relying way too much on stats, your proving they don't mean squat.

I can't imagine KO being second best in the league at any offensive stat, see how flawed all these stats are?

I know you could care less about Bogut winning a championship, Mozgov helping the Cavs to the Finals, and KO helping the Celtics to a 100% improvement in winning %.

And I know you could care less that the NBA changed the rules.

cowens/oldschool wrote:I can't imagine KO being second best in the league at any offensive stat, see how flawed all these stats are?

I guess the only thing not flawed is your eye test. The same eyes that hated the Olynyk pick from day one.

How about we drop this like the mods already asked us to?

Fine I think I proved my point using your stats.

If anybody is inclined to give Isaiah or others for KO's outstanding +/- numbers, take a look at the Celtics +/- numbers from before the All Star break.

Just like as a rookie, KO led ALL Celtics rotation players.

http://stats.nba.com/team/#!/1610612738/onoffcourt/?sort=PLUS_MINUS&dir=1&Season=2014-15&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&PerMode=Per48&SeasonSegment=Pre%20All-Star

well thank god hes got a great head of hair!!!!

rambone wrote:If anybody is inclined to give Isaiah or others for KO's outstanding +/- numbers, take a look at the Celtics +/- numbers from before the All Star break.

Just like as a rookie, KO led ALL Celtics rotation players.

http://stats.nba.com/team/#!/1610612738/onoffcourt/?sort=PLUS_MINUS&dir=1&Season=2014-15&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&PerMode=Per48&SeasonSegment=Pre%20All-Star

bro sorry I had to take a look, our top 2 in whatever that number was were Gerald Wallace and James Young, and for obvious reasons they could hardly ever get on the floor....yet they had the highest avg? does anybody see how these stats mean NOTHING!!

I said among regular players, not statistical outliers with tiny sample size.

If you don't know what a statistical outlier is, or what a sample size is, and have no interest in learning, I wish you the best with the tools at your disposal.

okay, thanks for educating me.

rambone wrote:

cowens/oldschool wrote:I can't imagine KO being second best in the league at any offensive stat, see how flawed all these stats are?

I guess the only thing not flawed is your eye test. The same eyes that hated the Olynyk pick from day one.

How about we drop this like the mods already asked us to?

Good advice.

I think we already stopped like 8 hours ago.